‘Lawyering up’ changes injury claim process

There may be misleading advice from some adjusters about the consequences of not making a deal.

Is it cheating for an insurance adjuster to mislead you, or is deception fair game in a negotiation?

This is the third in a series of columns dedicated to the exposure of insurance adjuster deception.

This time, my focus is on the artificial nature of the negotiation of a personal injury settlement and the misleading advice some adjusters give about the consequences of not making a deal.

An inattentive driver causes you injuries and losses.

Our civil justice system gives you the “claim” or “right of action” against that driver for fair, financial compensation for those injuries and losses.

It is the claim that is negotiated with an adjuster who works for the inattentive driver’s liability insurance company.

The adjuster will often make the first offer. You want nothing more than to be treated fairly.

Negotiations, generally, are uncomfortable for you.

Your discomfort is compounded by your complete lack of familiarity with this claim thing and what settlement amount might be fair.

Many people have told you not to accept the insurance company’s first offer. You follow that advice and reject it.

The adjuster will ask you how much compensation you think is fair. Of course, you don’t have a clue.

You fear being perceived as greedy if you respond with too high a number.

I’ve written before about negotiating the purchase of a beautiful stone carved chess set while vacationing in Mexico.

I had no idea what it was worth. I didn’t want to seem greedy or insulting by offering too little in response to the $200 price-tag, but I also didn’t want to be ripped off.

I ended up being ripped off!

The reality is that it doesn’t really matter what number you give the adjuster.

The adjuster is working within a fixed “authority” of compensation he or she is permitted to offer.

If you have reached a plateau in your symptoms after following every medical recommendation available to you, such that your symptoms are likely to continue indefinitely, that “authority” will never come close to fair compensation.

Yes, the offer will increase.

That “don’t accept their first offer” advice will turn out to be good advice. Perhaps a bit of back and forth will ensue.

On reaching that authority, the adjuster will be firm that it is all the compensation he or she can or will offer.

Often, your choice will be described as one between settling your case at that amount or going to trial.

I have also heard of some adjusters saying that if you choose to “lawyer up,” that offer will be off the table, insinuating that their settlement position might go down.

Not having any idea that the offer is completely outside the ballpark of fair and fearful of a trial, you are likely to accept the offer.

The truth is that the adjuster you are dealing with is only the start of the negotiation.

“Lawyering up” automatically results in a new adjuster being appointed and a completely different “authority” process.

Another truth is that trials are required in only a very small percentage of personal injury claims.

It’s absolutely not a choice of “accept this or go to trial.”

The true choice is to “accept this or hire a lawyer and the negotiation will continue”.

A trial is necessary only if, after a prolonged, further negotiation, the much higher new level of authority is so far below what is fair that you decide to go through the process in order to achieve justice.

Just Posted

Lake Country powwow brings together community

The 23rd annual Winter Family Gathering Traditional Pow Wow was held Nov. 17

Beat the Mondays: Trapped in Bali? Lessons learned from an erupting volcano

Gina Petrovich is a travel writer for the Kelowna Capital News

From punk rock to politics, D.O.A. comes to Kelowna to Fight Back

The punk rock legends the will play in Kelowna to celebrate their 40th anniversary

Cost of parking at Kelowna’s airport taking off

City says hiking all parking rates at the airport will help pay for more parking in future

Your morning news in 90: Nov. 20, 2018

Tune in for 90 seconds to get the top headlines for the Okanagan, Shuswap and Similkameen.

Morning crash shuts down Kamloops road

A crash stalled the morning communte in Kamloops on Wednesday

Police looking into two more incidents at private Toronto all-boys’ school

Police and the school have said two of the prior incidents involved an alleged sexual assault

Bovine tuberculosis found in cow on southern B.C. farm

CFIA said the disease was found during slaughter and they are investigating

Driver ticketed after crash on Bruhn Bridge in Sicamous

The bridge is the Trans-Canada Highway’s crossing point for the Sicamous Channel

Air force getting more planes but has no one to fly them, auditor warns

The report follows several years of criticism over the Trudeau government’s decision not to launch an immediate competition to replace the CF-18s.

B.C.’s Esi Edugyan wins $100K Giller prize for Washington Black

Edugyan won her first Scotiabank Giller Prize in 2011 for Half-Blood Blues

Bolder action needed to reduce child poverty: Campaign 2000 report card

The report calls for the federal government to provide more funding to the provinces, territories and Indigenous communities to expand affordable, quality child care.

Judge bars US from enforcing Trump asylum ban

Protesters accused the migrants of being messy, ungrateful and a danger to Tijuana; complained about how the caravan forced its way into Mexico, calling it an “invasion.”

Most Read