Hergott: Should the text sender be liable if recipient happens to be driving at the time?

The choice made by 18-year-old Kyle Best to text with his girlfriend while driving causes David and Linda to each lose a leg.

David Kubert, riding his motorcycle with his wife Linda as his passenger, sees the pickup truck driver steering with his elbows, his head down, immediately before the head-on crash.

The truck had drifted across the centre line.

The choice made by 18-year-old Kyle Best to text with his girlfriend while driving causes David and Linda to each lose a leg.

Kyle pleads guilty to distracted driving. He is ordered to speak to 14 high schools about the dangers of texting and driving and has to pay about $775 in fines.

As you would expect, Kyle also faces a civil case brought by David and Linda, who are seeking fair compensation for their losses arising from his careless choice.

What isn’t expected is that Kyle’s girlfriend, Shannon, is also included in that lawsuit.

Does it make sense that Kyle’s texting accomplice is included in the lawsuit? If Shannon knew that Kyle was driving during their texting exchange, isn’t she as responsible as Kyle is for the crash?

It was her texts that distracted him from the road.

This particular incident was a  New Jersey case. Shannon’s lawyer applied to a New Jersey judge to dismiss the case against her client.

The application, heard last week Friday, was successful, as the judge ruled that it’s reasonable for text message senders to assume that recipients will behave responsibly.  That decision is being appealed.

Shannon had already given evidence under oath in a deposition that she didn’t know whether Kyle had been driving at the time of the text exchange.

I expect the decision would have been different if there had been proof that she had been aware.

The wheels of justice often move slowly, so I won’t hold my breath for the results of the appeal.

What I will do, though, if the right case comes across my desk, is pursue the same arguments here in British Columbia.

It makes sense to me that those knowingly contributing to a dangerous situation should be held accountable.

I would want there to be compelling proof the texting partner knew or ought to have known that the driver was actively engaging in the texting exchange while driving.

An example: A girlfriend having a continuous texting exchange with her boyfriend who she knows is driving on the Coquihalla Highway.

Proof would be easier with a cell phone conversation, than with a text.

With a conversation, you can tell from the vehicle noises and context of the discussion that the person you are conversing with is driving.

Even though the distraction level is the same, whether you chat on a hand-held or hands free cell phone, only hand-held cell phone use while driving is banned so far in British Columbia.

That distinction won’t stop me from suing you on behalf of an injured victim if your hands free cell phone discussion distracts you to the point of causing a crash.

It also won’t stop me from including your accomplice, the person you were chatting with, as an additional defendant in the lawsuit.

Make the choice to stop being an accomplice to distracted driving.

Refuse to participate in a texting exchange with someone you know or believe to be behind the wheel.

If a driver insists on chatting with you on a cell phone, require the driver to pull over before participating in the discussion.

You will face irritation from drivers who you inconvenience by your choice. I certainly have faced that irritation.

Feel free to blame me if a safety justification feels insufficient.

The driver is protected by mandatory liability insurance if he or she hurts someone. You aren’t.

Just Posted

Kayaker still missing as COSAR continues aerial searches

71-year-old Zygmunt Janiewicz was reported missing Friday

Get those flowers competition ready

Gardeners will come together June 29, for the 22nd Juried Flower Show

New law introduced to make donating “easier for Canadians”

MP Dan Albas introduces crypto currency-favouring legislation

Okanagan-Shuswap Weather: Most long-weekend rain has already fallen

A mix of sun and cloud is expected for the last two days of the the Victoria Day weekend.

Update: Mother dead, youth in critical condition after carbon monoxide poisoning at Sandy Point Campground

The woman was found unresponsive insider her tent and the youth was taken via air ambulance to hospital

Weather holds up for Rutland May Days

60th annual May Day midway, market and entertainment saw hundreds of attendees

Update: Plan to see more smoke from South Okanagan wildfire

Richter Creek wildfire, 12 kilometres west of Osoyoos, is an estimated 400 hectares

‘Teams that win are tight’: B.C. Lions search for chemistry at training camp

The Lions added more than 50 new faces over the off-season, from coaching staff to key players

B.C. VIEWS: Reality of our plastic recycling routine exposed

Turns out dear old China wasn’t doing such a great job

Okanagan tattoo fundraiser draws tons of support

Lineup around the block in Vernon for start of Five Fathoms Tattoo event for Children’s Hospital

Carbon dioxide at highest levels for over 2.5 million years, expert warns of 100 years of disruption

CO2 levels rising rapidly, now higher than at any point in humanity’s history

Fundraising campaign for church shooting victim exceeds goal

A seperate campaign for the man killed in the April 14 shooting is nearing $25,000 raised.

Crews responding to car crash in West Kelowna

A collision has been reported at the intersection of Carrington Road and Butt Road.

Court decision prompts regional district to throw flood mitigation back at province

Public safety minister maintains Newsome Creek concerns in hands of local government

Most Read