Hergott: Attentive driving responsibility should be considered

Is a rear-ender collision always the fault of the rear-ending driver?

Paul Hergott

I have proposed, for inattentive driving, similar roadside penalties as are imposed on impaired drivers.

To avoid unfair application, I proposed that they be imposed only “in that ridiculous rear-ender scenario that ‘on the face of it’ could not have occurred had the rear-ending driver been attentive.”

The penalties would not be applied on the basis of any particular distracting behaviour, but on the basis of an actual collision.

The proof of the inattentive driving is in the pudding, so to speak.

If there is any uncertainty about how the collision occurred—any alternative explanation for the rear-ending collision besides a glaring lack of attention to the road ahead, no penalty would be imposed.

My proposal raises the issue what those alternative explanations might be.

The very recent court decision of Bingul vs. Youngson, 2016 BCSC 1868, released October 12, 2016, gives us an example.

Mr. Bingul’s 1991 Toyota Corolla was rear-ended by a tandem axle dump truck driven by Mr. Youngson.

The truck, along with the excavator-loaded trailer it was pulling, had a total combined weight estimated at 44,000 kgs.

The Toyota weighed something under 1,500 kg.

Mr. Bingul says that he stopped behind other traffic at a red light and the truck stopped behind him.

After two to three minutes, the light turned green. Before traffic ahead of him had cleared, the truck struck his car from behind.

Mr. Youngson tells a completely different story.  He says that he had a clear lane ahead of him as he was approaching a traffic light that had turned yellow, and that he had been braking and down-shifting to prepare to stop.

When he was about 30 feet from the stop line, sufficient distance to bring 44,000 kg of truck and trailer safely to a stop, Mr. Bingul cut in front of his truck, cutting his stopping distance in half.

Madam Justice Baker reviewed the case law that has developed with regard to rear-ender collisions.

She started with the following quote from a previous case: “…when one vehicle hits another from behind, the onus is on the driver of the rear vehicle to show that the collision was not caused by his or her fault…”.

She continued with this quote from the same case: “But while liability for a rear end collision usually rests entirely with the following driver, that is not an invariable result…”

What do you do, as a judge, when you have two people with completely different stories about what happened?

Madam Justice Baker noted that “…the assessment of the credibility of the two versions of events offered by the two drivers must depend on the internal consistency of their testimony and the consistency of their testimony with other testimony and evidence”.

After reviewing all the evidence, Madam Justice Baker decided to accept the version of events given by Mr. Youngson.

She concluded as follows: “Mr. Bingul was aware that there was a large and heavy vehicle in the lane.

“I conclude that it was solely Mr. Bingul’s sudden and negligent move into the lane of travel of Mr. Youngson’s large and heavy vehicle that created the risk of collision and resulted in the accident.”

This is a lesson to those who dart in and out of traffic in an effort to get to the very front of the line at an intersection.

Big trucks can’t stop on a dime, and you put yourself in danger when you dart in front of 44,000 kg of truck that’s slowing for a light.

Another lesson is that some people really are dishonest enough that two completely different stories can be told about the same collision.

It is advisable to get the names and contact information of witnesses at the scene of a collision even if, from your perspective, liability could not possibly go against you.

There is always the possibility that the offending driver will lie through their teeth.

Just Posted

Three UBC Okanagan students awarded women in tech scholarships

Computer science and math students hope the award will inspire others

Missing Kelowna woman, Cassy Miller found dead

Miller went missing Nov. 6 and was found 10 days later

Rockets break four game losing streak in Edmonton

The Rockets defeated the Oil Kings 3-1

Okanagan Floral Design students create elaborate Christmas arrangements

The students are making the floral arrangements as part of the Homes for the Holidays tour

Reduce, reuse, recycle: Repair cafes gaining popularity in Kelowna

The Regional District of the Central Okanagan’s cafe was held at Okanagan College Saturday

REPLAY: B.C’s best video this week

In case you missed it, here’s a look at the replay-worth highlights from this week across the province

Victoria spent $30,000 to remove John A. Macdonald statue

Contentious decision sparked controversy, apology from mayor

South region forestry workers nearly in legal strike position

Talks broke down between USW and IFLRA, resulting in booking out of provincial mediator

Privacy concerns over credit card use for legal online pot purchases

Worries follow privacy breaches at some Canadian cannabis retailers

NEB approves operating pressure increase to repaired Enbridge pipeline

The pipeline burst outside of Prince George on Oct. 9, now operating at 85 per cent

B.C. VIEWS: Setting speed limits in a post-fact political environment

Media prefer ‘speed kills’ narrative, even when it fails to appear

Controversy erupts over Japanese flag in B.C. classroom

Online petition demanding removal has collected more than 5,700 signatures

Death toll rises to 76 in California fire with winds ahead

Nearly 1,300 people remain unaccounted for more than a week after the fire began

Trump says report on Khashoggi death expected in a few days

Jamal Khashoggi was a columnist for The Washington Post who was slain Oct. 2 inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul

Most Read